<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>So-called &amp;quot;art theft&amp;quot; Orphan Works bill - Crafty Vixens - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://craftyvixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65?format=atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#96049084-b2d3-4ba6-8187-e9fc04bc565a" />
    <author>
      <name>Margaret</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#96049084-b2d3-4ba6-8187-e9fc04bc565a</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T05:43:33Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-14T05:43:33Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hah. I went on Tribe tonight immediately after reading a post on another non-Tribe bulletin board that copied the Mark Simon article. &#xD;
Here's a refutation:&#xD;
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/12/countering-the-fud-a.html</summary>
    <dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T05:43:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#b0f1e637-0776-497c-8ac9-e90612a54b54" />
    <author>
      <name>Sprout</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#b0f1e637-0776-497c-8ac9-e90612a54b54</id>
    <updated>2008-04-13T03:23:27Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-13T03:23:27Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Crafting as art, that's a whole other thread :)&#xD;
&#xD;
Oooh, ooooh, I'll start it! :X</summary>
    <dc:creator>Sprout</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-13T03:23:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#4d6e6162-0da9-438b-9003-c07e310cd1e9" />
    <author>
      <name>Fondue</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#4d6e6162-0da9-438b-9003-c07e310cd1e9</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T14:31:12Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-12T14:15:58Z</published>
    <summary type="html">SPark....always a step ahead of the rest of us.&#xD;
&#xD;
Sit down and have a cuppa.&#xD;
We'll all catch up...</summary>
    <dc:creator>Fondue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-12T14:15:58Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#d52563ac-841b-4e10-8ee5-fdb817041667" />
    <author>
      <name>SPark</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#d52563ac-841b-4e10-8ee5-fdb817041667</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T10:41:34Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-12T10:41:34Z</published>
    <summary type="html">It's about creation, and copyright.  If that doesn't apply to crafting, then I guess crafting isn't an art, but I think of it as such.&#xD;
&#xD;
And this thing has been discussed on pretty much every other arts-related community I was on.  I figured it was only a matter of time until somebody brought it up here.</summary>
    <dc:creator>SPark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-12T10:41:34Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#f8eaff83-2d9c-476f-a3e9-60e41f9e5df4" />
    <author>
      <name>Tatt</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#f8eaff83-2d9c-476f-a3e9-60e41f9e5df4</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T09:27:44Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-12T09:27:44Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Forgive me SPark, I have never seen anything with regard to this subject.   &#xD;
yet I'm curious how it applies to the context of this tribe.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Tatt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-12T09:27:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#e937b5af-808c-4e55-b5f9-df9cac64e266" />
    <author>
      <name>SPark</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#e937b5af-808c-4e55-b5f9-df9cac64e266</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T08:35:33Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-12T08:35:33Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Sorry, I was getting annoyed at seeing this thing repeatedly posted, and I forgot to include actual facts.  &#xD;
&#xD;
The text of the bill itself:&#xD;
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/t2GPO/http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:h5439ih.txt.pdf&#xD;
(You'll need to click the "continue to GPO site" link to get it.)&#xD;
&#xD;
A report about the situation that inspired the bill from the US Copyright office:&#xD;
http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf&#xD;
&#xD;
I have seen one article mentioning the return of this bill, here:&#xD;
http://oncopyright.copyright.com/2008/03/17/orphan-works-are-back-on-congress%E2%80%99s-radar-screen/&#xD;
&#xD;
However, the bill is NOT listed for the current session of congress.&#xD;
&#xD;
http://thomas.loc.gov/ is where you can look up current legislation.</summary>
    <dc:creator>SPark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-12T08:35:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>So-called "art theft" Orphan Works bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#5f822179-1de4-4461-b8f4-59771e236eb3" />
    <author>
      <name>SPark</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://CraftyVixens.tribe.net/thread/1080233f-dece-4d9e-82b1-889963b30a65#5f822179-1de4-4461-b8f4-59771e236eb3</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T08:12:18Z</updated>
    <published>2008-04-12T08:12:18Z</published>
    <summary type="html">If you see somebody posting about  this article: http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&amp;amp;article_no=3605&amp;amp;page=1 and starting into the paranoid, tinfoil hat routine about how the government is going to legalize art theft, THIS IS NOT TRUE. &#xD;
&#xD;
There was an Orphan Works bill.&#xD;
&#xD;
Said Orphan Works bill did NOT legalize art theft.&#xD;
&#xD;
Said Orphan Works bill was NOT pushed by freaking Bill Gates (good grief!)&#xD;
&#xD;
Said Orphan Works bill DIED and was not passed.&#xD;
&#xD;
It's over.&#xD;
&#xD;
It's done.&#xD;
&#xD;
We don't need to bother our congressman, or sign a petition, or whatever other action the people running around like Chicken Little and screaming about the sky falling on artists everywhere are advocating.&#xD;
&#xD;
THERE IS NO ORPHAN WORKS BILL RIGHT NOW.  There was, it's dead, and can we PLEASE MOVE ON ALREADY?&#xD;
&#xD;
Sorry if I sound grouchy, but I'm really sick of hearing about this, and I want to head it off anywhere it hasn't yet spread before people get all worked up over nothing.</summary>
    <dc:creator>SPark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-12T08:12:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



